heres one i made. needs feedback.

>>9165200
That is interesting.

>>9165222
i made a cycle of blink lands. can upload the rest if you wish.

>>9165233

Yes, please.

Here's a couple I made last night. The thread reached the image limit before I posted them. I'm sure they're unbalanced and formatted wrong, but eh.

1/2

>>9165265
2/2

yeah, theyre tribal. prolly wont stay that way. lemme know what you think of blink.

3/5

this >>9165284 was 4/5


5/5

this thread died fairly quickly. the other one was pretty hoppin'. i think i kill threads...

dude i like that
blink is a realy cool ability but i think it should just belong to certain groups of cards
espeacialy for fairies its realy cool because they often have flash or sth.
good job ;)
ps: excuse my bad english

i made my first today but i dont know how to convert it to a jpg so i can post it
help plz

Didn't get to post this last thread...

Couldn't post this either...

>>9167312
If it is Unreachable, then why do the creatures reach you?

Not even mana should let them be able to do so.

>>9167393
Because then it would have to have a drawback

>>9167455
The unreachable turns out to be reachable.
The nothing turns to everything.
Magic balance is serious stuff.

>>9167455
Is that a picture of what happens when Dark Eldar rape Necron?

>>9167393
lern2hyperbole noob

oh look this thread again.

>>9167376

>>9167171
oh wow, that is not insanely overpowered

>>9168204
>>9168297
would appreciate feedback on these two. balanced?

Alright, then, let's see what happens.

>>9168204
Hard to tell. Maybe 6 mana is cheap for play and win/lose/draw. Compare with the pic(even though you have that damn Hexmage).
>>9168297
Seem pretty balanced to me.

>>9168297
well, i would make it this way

>>9168619
seems needlessly complex

>>9167987
You're right. It's not. Just block it.

>>9168204
Each player sacrifices all permanents they control. Then, the player with the most cards in his or her graveyard wins.

If two or more players are tied, the game is a draw.

Iunno.

>>9167987
Actually, it's not. By turn 6, you can just put a 0/1 token in the thing's way consistently, and it will do jack-all nothing. If you can't block, you take 10. I might lower it to Frenzy 7 or 8, or maybe make it cost a bit more, but I wouldn't call it OP at all.

>>9168616

>>9168619
That wouldn't do anything by itself. A creature that deals 0 damage is considered to have not dealt any damage, so it wouldn't trigger the Poisonous.

>>9168749
As an additional cost to cast CARDNAME, return a creature you control to it's owners hand.

Search your library for a land card, reveal it, then put it into your hand. You gain 2 life.

I'd say this would be better off either being an instant, as a combat trick, or only costing 3.

>>9168796
I reduced the cost and kept it as a sorcery. In terms of flavour, it wouldn't make sense to send a soldier home in the middle of a battle, so you should only do it in your own turn.

>>9168838
Fair enough, I thought that was what you were going for. But really, even though White rarely gets landsearching by itself, that was way overcosted at 4.

>>9168615

Cool card.

>>9168857

>>9168961
Vlad as a Dragon Tamer. I could see it.

>>9169001

>>9168961
Make sure you capitalize the name when you refer to it in the card.

Journeyman Dragon Tamer

When CARDNAME enters the battlefield, put a 1/1 red dragon creature token with flying onto the battlefield.

3: Put a 1/1 red dragon creature token with flying onto the battlefield.

I might make it so you have to tap him to do it, though.

>>9169099
not sure I got the wording right on that one. Rules guy, can you clear it up?

I'm starting to run out of arts, will have to start with fanarts...

>>9169125
The card is fine, except it shouldn't get you a dragon as it enters the battlefield.

Should be a rare.

>>9168765
Proposital. You have poisonous 3 for 1 colorless. It could even cost 0 if you find it underpowered.

>>9169125

I'll post a few pictures. See what we get out of them.

>>9169099
Prevent all combat damage that would be dealt to CARDNAME.

Whenever CARDNAME blocks, the blocked creature's controller discards a card.

>>9169171
The tap symbol is always the last thing before the colon on an activated ability, unless there's a phrase. SO it would be 3, Tap: not Tap, 3:

>>9169165
Yes, I know, but I mean unless you have some way of pumping it, it's not all that good. You'd have to have a shitload of targeted pump, or global pump which wouldn't be online until turn 3 or 4, to make it win.

>>9169173
I'm not a M:tG player, but I scour these threads for nice pictures. And that, I must say, is an exceptional picture. Thank you.

Have a picture I saw earlier.

>>9169246
I tried typing it that way, but it wouldn't let me. It kept putting the tap symbol in front of the 3. *shrug*

>>9169139

>>9169296
I've noticed that seems to be a trend with the Card maker. It makes you do it that way; how odd.

>>9169309
I like it, but I'd try and give it a way to get more fish counters. Maybe invest some mana, and/or tap creatures to show that they've 'gone fishing'? I like the effect, but I'd like the ability to use it more than once if possible.

Oh look. This thread again.

>>9169173

I'm new to this but here you go.

>>9169296
You need to put a comma in between costs. "3, T: Do a thing" should work.

>>9169408
Enchantment - Aura

Enchant Non-Basic Land

Enchanted land is a forest.

>>9169408
Should be an "Enchantment - Aura" with the ability "Enchant land". Also, nonbasic is one word. Also, capitalization.

>>9169432
Hm... maybe make it +1/+2 and double-strike. Battle Mastery costs 2W and gives just doublestrike, Holy Strength costs W and gives +1/+2, so I think that should be about fair for the mana cost.

Hooray, my favorite thread

should be all good now.

>>9169493
WEll, the wording and all is fine. I think the power level is about right; you could 'abuse' it with blink effects, but there's much scarier stuff to blink in a red deck anyway.\

>>9169451
I'd say it would be Enchant Nonbasic land, since it doesn't do shit to a basic land the way he has it.

>>9169484

Let's get more creatures going, there's been a lot of lands and enchantments lately.

>>9169591
Capitalize Wizard, don't capitalize Sacrifice on the first ability.

Chained Horror 3UUBB
Creature - Horror
As an additional cost to cast CARDNAME, sacrifice a Wizard.

Tap, Sacrifice a Wizard: Counter target spell

Let's see what you make with porn, /tg/.

>>9169334

>>9169324
Fear my originality.

>>9169606

Don't tempt me to dump Monster Hunter, dude. We'd be here for a week.

>>9169661
Hmmm... Yeah, nothing I can think of ruling-wise or wording-wise. Cost seems about right, since Douse in Gloom was 2B for only 2 damage and 2 life to a creature, and a hard-counter is 1UU. Having a choice between either for 4 seems just fine.

>>9169661

Good, solid little common for control/drain decks.

>>9169324

>>9169714

As it is, way too powerful, because you can essentially nullify your opponent's lands with him. I see what you're going for though, so I'd make his second ability "2U, T: Target land becomes an Island in addition to its other land types. (This effect is permanent.)"

>>9169801

Wizards pretty much got to it already...

>>9169775

Very good. Costed well.

>>9169801

Raise the evoke cost by one blue mana (sideboard interactions should be expensive), otherwise fine.

>>9169844
It now more closely resembles cunning wish

>>9169652

Heh heh heh.

What about a Mutalisk?

>>9169878

Also acceptable. Hell, the right setup and I might use that.

>>9169714

Really though, I just like making cards to right flavour text

>>9169903

I get that it's a joke card, but if you were making that for real I'd say make it white (white tends to stop attackers more) and lower the cost by 1.

>>9169919

'Then again, some ancient terrors refuse to be forgotten'

?

>>9169919
>it's other types
You are writing privileges are now revoked.

>>9169940

>>9169966
;_;

Let's see what /tg/ does with an ambiguously gendered ninja.

>>9169984
What type of counters?

>>9170019

:D

>>9169917

Very blue flavored. I like.

>>9169984

Make it legendary and give the counters a name. They need a name of some kind. Otherwise fine.

>>9169990

Solid little black common, although poison is really more green's thing.

>>9170019
Good. He should at least be uncommon though, and capitalize Island.

>>9170073
Done

I was thinking of deserts when I made this, So I referenced both "dehydrate" and "assasinate" with it's abilities

>>9168426

Pretty much a rip off Knight of Dawn, except less useful. Probably should boost it's power some.

>>9170106
I love it. Very flavourful

>>9170016

it does this

this better be the last time :x

>>9170077
Ehehehehe, it lets you Twiddle.

>>9170202
dohohoho

what can you make out of this?

Had no good idea for a flavor text

>>9170172

Well played, sir. Well played.

>>9170077

Aww, you made a better one than I did. :P

A throwback to one of my favorite Urza's Block mechanics.

>>9170301
if it is an enchantment?

>>9170268

prty AWESOME

>>9170313
Because if it's already turned into a creature, it's silly to have it turn into a creature again.

It's worded like the Opal, Hidden, Veiled etc enchantments from Urza block.

>>9170313
As opposed to being a creature, yes.

>>9170330
It's shit like this that makes modern art look good.

>>9170250

>>9170302
Jesus christ that game sucked. Cool robots though.

Was going to upload a pretty cool Zodd picture, filter said it had malicious code or some shit. Have a Birth of Evil instead.

>>9170414
lame

>>9170414

Well played, good sir.

>>9170414
Damn, beat me to it.

>>9170456
>>9170454
>>9170368
I love it when loads of different cards come from the same art.

>>9170368
A free Vindicate? That's just nuts.

>>9170454
>protection from spells
Fucking moron

Also, fuck this thread and every thread like it. /tg/ fails so hard at basic magic design it's not even funny anymore. It's just pathetic knowing that not all of these shitty cards are trollposts

>>9170496
>waaah waaah stop having fun guys

Shit, I just realized one could make an entire thread just using Odilon Redon's paintings.

"mana burn will be in m12" -maro254

>>9170456

OP, and kinda fails the Mephistopheles test.

>>9170546
The what?

>>9170496
I know. I mean, this one retard gave his card Protection from instants. Wizards would never print that kind of shit.

>>9170496
actually, protection from spells is legitimate. It just means it can't be targeted by spells on the stack. It can, however, be targeted, dealt damage by and what have you by permanents
>>9170502
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=190160

>>9170587
That's different, you fucking moron.

Everything is a fucking spell. Something with "protection from spells" would be immune to everything but fucking lands.

>>9170620
this isn't true; a "spell" becomes a permanent as it resolves (that is, if it is a permanent, and not an instant or a sorcery)

See: Emrakul, the Aeons Torn, which has protection from colored spells, but can be exiled with oblivion ring or journey to nowhere

>>9170620
These threads may not be the best but please pack the trollwagon up and go party in /b/ or something.

>>9170601

Well, son of a bitch. Good catch.

>>9170620
Not true. Things stop being spells once they have been cast successfully. They wouldn't have protection from creatures, since creatures stop being spells, they're permanents.

SCIENCE

>>9170546
Yeah, what the fuck it the Mephistopheles test? Google has turned up nothing.

>>9170620

Actually, it means that permanents could target him, and that sorceries and instants could not. Enchantments could target him as long as they weren't Auras.

So make some cards of your own. Or better yet, select the gun, select your horse, and get the fuck out. Nobody cares what you think.

I don't think I saw anyone use this picture: >>9169689

It's my first, so flame away.

>>9170699
Needs to have Enchant Creature in the description box.

>>9170683

The Mephistopheles test is an unwritten, almost-never-violated rule of Magic card design at Wizards. Any card that has more text/requires more thinking than the card Chains of Mephistopheles is no good.

Picture attached.

And don't misunderstand me, with some rewording that card could be good, but right now it's just a little much.

>>9170683
I assume it's, "Cards shouldn't have rules text longer than Chains of Mephistopheles."

>>9170699

Needs Enchant Creature.

Also, given how nobody play auras because it's an inherently bad cardtype, it could probably stand to be a bit more aggressively costed - or maybe give it Flash, as a sudden burst of courage.

>>9170720
This card is alot easier to understand then that red torment spell that copies a spell for all the targets it could possibly have

>>9170699

That's actually extremely white. However, it does seem a little powerful. You could either boost the cost by 1, or else make it an Equipment at that cost with Equip cost 2. The benefit there being that you can save it for later attachment.

Good first try though, keep 'em coming.

>>9170594

>>9170720
well how could it be rewritten to make sense?

>>9165265
Art for this, please?

>>9170753

That card was my introduction to the Mephistopheles rule, actually.

I'm leaving the reminder text in on this guy only because I know how old a rule Rampage is.

>>9170856
that's a tad ridiculous

>>9170735

>>9170747
>>9170711

Whoops, forgot they changed that. I'm really more of an old-school M:tG player.

I like the burst of courage idea, but damn is that text getting small.

Last night, I created a series of cards using a new mechanic, but the thead 404'd before I got any feedback. If I uploaded the cards (along with the art, if anyone requests it), could I get some commentary on the mechanic and on the cards?

>>9170950

Nice.

>>9170547
Stretching out the gravestones on the bottom gives a neat effect.

>>9170950
There's already a card in Ravnica with that name IIRC.

>>9170937
Challenge your opponent to a boxing contest. Whoever wins, wins the game.

Challenge your opponent to a dual. Whoever wins goes straight to jail for first degree murder but also wins the game.

>>9171125

There's no laws against dualing.

>>9170825
over ruled the text... sry

>>9171149
I ment duel. Helps if your opponent calls your wife a whore too.

Let's try a Yian Garuga, given the success of the Lagiacrus...

>>9170878
Is this better?

>>9171162

OH GOD

THE WORDS

>>9171162
Holy christ that's terribly written.

>>9171249
>Wolf Mutant
Sounds about right.

>>9171244
Only more TR can express my happiness.

>>9171162
Holy shit, what the fuck are you doing?

>>9171285

"into play under its owner's control." should be the end of that card.

I expect good things from this one.

image limit reached

>>9171369
Archive?

Image limit reached, time for a new thread

>>9171215
>>9171260
>>9171291
Sry...
better options for something like that? comes into play, exile some creatures, put artifacts tokens in place... whenever any token leaves play return the exiled version...
oh, it should be rare...

new thread

>>9171487

>>9170544
Link that shit, bro. If you're still here.