I run a empire of the rising sun army pic related

>>12580929
I run tiberium sun/wars era GDI army's

I tend to run Edo period Japan. It was such a clusterfuck back then you can steal a metric tonne of gold and nobody would notice. Then you just resynch to 1938 Switzerland and put everything in a deposit box, then resynch back, take a stroll and collect it, plus interest.

TROLOLOLOLOLO

>afdrical rightful

>Always liked Chem troops from Tiberium Dawn because they were so rare.

That's what I'd run. Either that, or Cabal from TibSun era, Core Defenders make Necron Monoliths look like crap in comparison.

Tiberium Wars era Forgotten. Sure, it's been years since we got a new book, but the list's still got some punch, and the models are pretty cool.

It is the apocalypse for you.

I run a Steel Talons Tiberium Wars-era army. C&C Third Edition FTW. 2nd Edition was alright, with the new fluff about CABAL and the Nod Cyborg revolt, but it really got awesome in 3rd.

Can't believe they took Titans and Wolverines out of 'regular' GDI forces for 3rd, though.

>>12580983
You don't get interest on gold.

Got rolled by a Marked of Cain crew just a few days ago, but then again I was using GDI from the Dawn era. Damned Awakened just rolled right over the few mammoth tanks I had.

Westwood really needs to release a new codex for Dawn GDI, but I'll probably be waiting another year for it.

poor nod has this reject for a epic unit. It looks like it can do allot of damage but this thing is taken out by 2 rail gun mammoth tanks

Runnin' Tiberium Sun-era Brotherhood Army. Cyborg Commandoes up in this motherfucker!

I wish they never updated the Soviet Army. The Apocalypse tank ain't want it used to be, thanks to Allied players always bitching about its armor save. At least those Twin-Blades they introduced are cool.

ARMY LISTS OR YOU GUYS DON'T KNOW SHIT 'BOUT CNC

RA 2 Era here, I got so goddamned irritated about all these fucking Yuri lists that I run a straight dog and tank list.

Fuck your bald telepaths.

>>12580929
Red Alert player here Tiberium sucks

>>12581030
You do when you put a swastika on it.

>>12581070

I'd just like to point out the Harriers on the far left that are about to wreck the shit out of those tanks.

I am both confused and intrigued.

Googling doesn't seem to help so...

Is this legit? If so, where can I find info on it?

>>12581096
It's not.

They're playing Pretend.

>10000 credit battle
>Decide to mess with opponent and build two obelisks at the start of the match.
>My face when he has no artillery to deal with them.

Fucking heavy vehicles, how do they work?

>>12581042
there going to give us a add on called renegade
GDI gets a commando codenamed Havoc. He looks OP as hell like a one man army

>>12581091
>RA2 edition Apoc tanks
>Harriers unleash payload
>Apoc tanks' armor isn't even scratched
>Harriers are instantly destroyed by Apocs' missile launchers

Just be glad Apoc tanks can't take up missile launchers anymore in the RA3 edition.

>>12581107
:(
Goddammit TG now I'm sad.

>>12581117

That picture is from the Allied Victory cutscene of RA2. Yes those tanks get their shit ruined.

>>12581120
Operation successful gentleman, we made this anon sad. job well done.

hay gaiz anybody play generals here the new codex is so cool for the america the GDI is sucks because they don't have laser missles

>>12581121
>Taking a cutscene seriously
>Allied victory
>Allies

Yeah, the Ultramarines of Red Alert. I wonder when RA will get some real writers and not some hack that watches Saturday morning cartoons...

>My face when none of this exists.

I am saddened, /tg/. Warhammer tabletop with base building, resource collection, and C&C troops? I was almost shitting bricks for a minute.

>>12581116
Oh god no please don't let this be true. Nod players are going to get fucked over by this

>Soviets get updated rules
>Yuri gets jack shit
Fuck this noise. I'm sticking with Yuri even if he is outdated.
>A NEW COMRADE JOINS US!

>>12581139
gtfo n00b

>>12581139
I used to play Generals, but I got tired of dealing with Jarmens always sniping my drivers. Also, ANTHRAX, ANTHRAX EVERYWHERE.

>>12581140
Them being corny Saturday morning cartoon heroes was the entire point of the game.

>>12580929
Steel Talons, motherfuckers.

I can't hear you over the sound of my mechs.

>>12581157
Ha ha, infidels gonna infid.
Also fuck China and it's nuclear holocaust bullshit.
The Overlord is still one sexy model though. I might need to convert another hijacked one for my GLA.

>>12581168
cry more oh and your going to love my nuke migs

>>12581168
I don't get it with those GLA players and hijackers. If you're gonna hijack my tanks, hijack all of them at once or enough so that they actually survive. All GLA players ever do is just hijack one of my Overlords only for it to get instantly raped by the rest of my armored column.

>>12581178
This ass hole is the reason I went to GDI! FUCK YOUR NUKES!

>mfw they let me use General Leang

Ex-Allied player here. Use to play Allied up until 2.5 when they released the new rules along with Yuri that stopped you spamming out heroes. No more Tanya rushes for me! :(

>>12581233

Just use the Navy Seals.
As for Tanya, they improved her, where she can also det pack vehicles and is now immune to psychics.

>>12581178
>nuke migs
Your mother was an infider

In all seriousness, a CNC wargame would rock.

Anyone here use Crazy Ivans ever? I always liked them but they were too situational for me.

Yuri army is my main (Mastermind/Yuri Prime list, gets the people at my FLGS all riled up), but I do run a Traveler Scrin force from time to time.

What can I say? I'm a sucker for mind control.

>>12581024
>>12581079
>50,000 Credit Army List

>HQ
MARV w/ 2 Anti-infantry turrets and 2 Rocket turrets - 6200

>Troops
8 Rifleman Squads w/ AP Ammo and Composite Armor Wargear - 2400+2500+2000
8 Missile Squads w/ Composite Armor Wargear - 2400+2000
4 Repair APCs - 2800
2 Mutant Mercenary Squads

>Fast Attack
9 Wolverines w/ AP Ammo Wargear - 8100+2500
6 Pitbulls w/ Mortar Wargear - 4200+2000

>Heavy
4 Titans w/ Railgun Wargear and Adaptive Armor Wargear - 5200+5000+1500

>>12581260
>immune to psychics
Goddamnit this is why I'm almost ready to drop Yuri and just go GLA full time.

RA 2.5 Soviet player here.

I run with Boris and a shitload of Tesla Troopers all shoved into Flak Tracks.

It's not the best strategy, but it's fun zooming wildly across maps.

Not liking the 3.0e RA rules, too corny. Plus Empire sucks. Bring back Yuri!

>>12581301

Tanya dies like a bitch to dedicated anti-infantry weapons, though.

>>12581140

Red Alert is an even more obvious self-parody than 40k.

And I have to notice that every addition to the RA series comes after the Allies winning the last one. Presumably, they always win because General Carville is their spiritual liege.

>>12581297
>Repair APCs

MOTHERFUCKER

It's assholes like you that make beating the Steel Talons IMPOSSIBLE!

>>12581342
I have to say this....DON'T OPEN THAT DOOR GENERAL!!!

>>12581086
Hah, one of my regular opponents decided to run a Conscript force - max infantry in Conscripts, and the bare minimum (I think a Flak Tack and maybe an engineer or two.

I burned all my dough on Tanya and a couple of Grizzlies.

He retaliated by swapping half his Cons for Dogs, for the speed to bumrush Tanya while my tanks was away in the Red Tide.

Then Yuri's lists came out.
Ain't shit going to fuck up a bumrush at the Personality like your first wave turning round to eat the second one.
Add Gatling tanks to taste.

>>12581316
>too corny
Just wait for 3.5

>>12581342
general carville is my spiritual liege

I remember back in the day, I used to run Seth as my HQ choice, just to get more raider buggies since he was so cheap on credits. Then, when era 2 came out, I used Oxanna for a while, but it just wasn't the same.

lol, all you newfags argue about your GLA and soviet and allied bullshit, I bet you fags wouldn't dare challeng my 2000 point first ed. Nod army.

>>12581301
GATLING TANKS, DO YOU USE THEM? The only real hero unit that's a fucking monster is Boris in 2.5e. He's the only one that actively destroy defenses from a distance. Tanya is a bitch compared to him.

just found this pic online. dafuck?

>>12581180
Disruption, deflection, distraction.

"GODDAMNIT FUCK ANOTHER ONE! what is even the point of that?"

"Holy fuck when did .they. get .there?"

*Bang*

ZOCOM here, rollin' with zone raider/hammerheads and zone shatterers.

Haters gon' hate.

>>12581400
Nod 1st ed? Pffft. Whatever. I've still got a Heavy Troopers-based Harkonnen army in the attic.

>>12581346
>Send MARV and Titans ahead of force, leave half the infantry to use their Dig In ability and hold objective
>Send Wolverines, Pitbulls, and other infantry to mop up as MARV and Titans pass
>Repair APCs keeping MARV and Titans from taking damage the whole way
>my face

Problem, Nod?

>>12581297
>Mfw no Mammoth Tanks

i run a Nod tib-war 3 blob army myself
>HQ
Command squad
General
2x Blackhand with Heavy MGs
Medic
4 Militia vets with 2 shotguns and 2 RPGs

>Elites
2x Black hand with Autoguns and 2 flamers each.

>Troops
8x Militia squads at conscript rank armed with SMGs, Assault rifles, Grenades and Confessors.
2x Missile squads at trained rank.

>Fast attack
Shadow team with infiltrate and Glider insertion rule. (Trained rank)
2x warbuggies
2x warbikes

>Heavy Support
Venom armed with Disruption pods and laser.
Flame tank with extra armour

>just a bunch of PLAYING PRETEND
>no actual rules

I guess.

Personally, 2e was my favorite, even playing today. It's really aged well in my opinion. 3rd is still great though, especially 3.5e. I just love the fluff behind Marked of Kane, even if they're not so great on the tabletop.

CABAL is even better plot-wise, but the models were really meant to be an addition to a Nod army, and don't stand up too well on their own. Core Defender is a beast, but it is fucking expensive, and everyone focuses on taking it down ASAP. It can draw fire away from your other troops, but it's not worth the point cost. I'd rather use CABAL Obelisk / Obelisk of Darkness combo behind some Firestorm walls. The obelisks cost about the same and I normally have a few firestorm barriers up anyway.

>>12581297
>infantry
>Steel Talons army
>ohshitniggerwhatareyoudoing.jpg

This thread just got me thinking

We should do something similar to Mass Workshop's project and make a C&C tabletop wargame based on 40k rules

It's not real, but we'll make it real.

>>12581698
Mass workshop got a rule set?

>>12581728
It's in the testing phase, last I checked. I think someone playtested it and said 'looks good'.

>Scrin player holds army in reserve for the whole first turn
>I infiltrate all my Stealth Tanks to his side of the table and space them closely enough to deny him any space to deploy
>win instantly
>my face

>>12581698
Sounds like a plan.
Do we want base building in it?
Or possibly bases as units you must protect and they provide more soldiers?

>>12581818
Ehh. Part of me wants to say 'yeah, base building, because C&C', but, that might not be so conducive to crunch, y'know?

>GDI Black Ops
>use Drop Troopers with illegal Nod chemical weapons
>put the rest of my points in a -CLASSIFIED- Mammoth Mk 2
>infiltrating Mutant Commandos hidden across the board

COME AT ME BRO!

>>12581837
However it would make it feel less like a 40k reskin like Mass Workshop.

>>12581884
Yeah, good point. Here's an idea; Players use their points to purchase defensive structures, support-power structures, and unit-production structures. The structures constantly produce units, or permit a player to use a given support power every X turns, with the defensive structures keeping enemy forces away. Destroy the enemy's base to win.

>>12581837
Base building wouldn't really fit into a tabletop version. It should be focused on armies fighting each other, if we do that it should be easier than mass effect to set up, since the units are already defined. It should probably be based on Kane's Wrath, since it has the best variety of factions.

>>12581909
>buy nothing but defensive structures
COME AT ME BRO

>>12581909
this could work.
you could buy engineers as attachments to squads and can capture buildings

>>12581915

Meh, instead of two warhams tables, you fit one C&C table to make up for space concerns.

>>12581909
Base building is probably out, but setting up a base might be a good idea. Players can spend points structures the same as units, and they are always deployed at the beginning. Rather than producing units though, I think buildings should give players access to unit types through the game's tech tree. In my opinion, tiberium harvesting and such would slow down the game too much. With buildings, if players want to use vehicles, for example, they need a Construction Yard / Power Plant, which would be required for everyone, and a War Factory for vehicles.

>>12581918

War Factory w/ Prism Tanks

>I AM AMUSED BY ENTIRE EETSY BEETSY TEENY BASE

So how's this:
-each player has a base HQ, which the opponent must destroy to win
-the player can spend points on units, tech buildings that unlock other units, production buildings that supply reinforcements and defencive buildings that act like stationary units with big guns.
-each turn you can move your units, shoot (or assault into close combat with certain units) and deploy reinforcements
-only some types of unit can be reinforced/produced, others are lost permanently when destroyed
-engineers can capture/disable buildings
-hero units are limited to 1 or 2 per side
-bases are set up first, then units
-turrets can not fire upon enemy buildings or into the enemy deployment zone

Since about 90% of the GLA players I go against just play rocket buggy and RPG spam, I totally troll them by bringing my Laser list. Just tons of Paladins and Avengers giving me saves against every rocket and missile fired at me pretty much neuters all of their firepower. My Avengers just sit back and covery my Crusaders and Paladins as they proceed to blow the shit out of them. Can you believe that Avengers are also AA units and can give friendly units rerolls to hit? That shit is totally OP.

>>12582505
maybe allow shadows and snipers to be upgradeable with off map artillary that can only be used once?

>>12582519

If the GLA has no fighters, and no AA beyond flak and Stingers, why don't USA / China just send their planes in at 30,000 feet and bomb the shit out of the GLA? Someone's gone full retard if they keep sending their planes in at low level.

And a thousand lols @ Auroras. After they release their payload they fly SLOWER? Who the hell wrote this?

>>12582519
Lasers as a doctrine is broken as all fuck.
Never was, never has been a good idea.
I think any ONE of those three would have bee acceptable, any two pretty damn good, but all three?
Bullshit.
Pinpoint Townes is verging on spiritual liege territory.

>>12582559
Yeah, Auroras pissed the fuck out of me.
Mostly the fact that they were basically cruise missiles against any half-way competent base defence.

>>12582555
Sounds like a plan.
Now it's been ages since I last played any C&C (and I can't get my Win7 machine to run RA3) so I won't be of much use for unit design on this one I'm afraid...

>>12582559
I know, right? Reminds me of this one time where some GLA player claimed he could use Jarman to snipe my Raptors. Nothing a couple of well placed Pathfinders couldn't solve, though.

>>12582642
No, they're not cruise missiles.

They're EXPENSIVE cruise missiles.

is this archived yet?

Got to writing on tabletop rules. Will probably need quite a bit of reworking.

Stage 1: Base construction
Players start with X amount of credits and an MCV. Deploy the MCV anywhere in your starting zone, which creates your Construction Yard. The Construction Yard allows you to rebuild buildings.

Once this is up, you may place other buildings in a radius around your MCV (Or just on your side of the board to keep it simple.). From your starting funds, subtract the cost of each building when you place them. You must have the prerequisites on the tech tree before you can place a building.

Buildings are made up of production buildings, which build units, tech buildings, which provide a special global ability and access to advanced units, refineries, which harvest tiberium and convert it into credits, and power plants, which are required to use buildings.

Power plants provide power to your base, and if the current amount of power drops below the required amount, base defenses and tech building abilities shut down.

Production builds allow you to build units each turn. Each base can produce a certain amount of units per turn, provided you have the credits to pay for them.

Tech buildings provide access to advanced units and also grant each side a global ability that can be used. For example, building a Temple of NOD not only grants access to Chemical Troopers, but also allows a player to call down a nuclear strike anywhere on the map after a certain amount of time has passed.

Once players have finished placing buildings, the skirmish begins.

I always get curbstomped by Soviet Mammoth Tanks+Volkov & Chitskoy+V2+Tesla Troopers

What should I use to counter those?

>>12582834

Nothing, because you're playing Allied in RA1.

>>12582855
so should I switch to RA2?

DAT BATTLE FORTRESS loaded with Chrono Legionnaires looks great

>>12582827
Oops, forgot to explain how the refinery works.

The refinery comes with a harvester unit that moves to tiberium patches and brings them back to base. Each turn, place the harvester on the nearest tiberium patch. At the start of your next turn, if the harvester is still in play, move it back to the refinery and remove the tiberium harvested. You gain credits each time the harvester makes its delivery.

Up to two harvesters can work from one refinery, one harvesting in the field, and one dropping off tiberium.

>>12582868

Go British Allies in that for the Yuri players.

Stuff a second Battle Fortress with Snipers.

>>12582834
>Volkov & Chitskoy
Nostalgia'd hard.

>>12582868
don't bother with chronos
use GI's and guardians

or switch to a RA3 list

CONSCRIPTS! SO MANY CONSCRIPTS!

>>12582899
FORGOT PIC!

>>12582827
>>12582872
Tiberium harvesting seems pointless. Keep it streamlined, don't bog it down with pointless mechanics.
Generators can stay, but refineries I do not like.

>>12582909

Well trained and equipped conscripts? That rather defeats the purpose of having conscripts doesn't it, Comrade Anon?

>>12582909
>>12582899
thats fucking baddass

>>12582868
guardian GIs in your battlefortresses rapes everything short of psychic units, and for less than half the price of chrono legionaires.

so any GDI players use Juggernaut+Disruptor combo?

>>12582923
They're still the cheapest units you can possibly get and they rack up promotions like it's no ones business.

Gotta love Firestorm-era pre-Cabal rebellion all-cyborg lists. Just Cyborgs, Cyborg Reapers, and Cyborg Commandos. Your anti-infantry weapons are worthless.

JESUS CHRIST SOME STUPID FUCK ARCHIVED THIS WRONG!

>>12582988
cant be that bad
>homestuck thread
FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Don't mind me, just being the best standard foot unit in the game.

anyone gonna archive this thread right?

>>12583021

SIR YES SIR
HOOAH

I love how the cutscenes actually did use roided out GIs using M60s like rifles.

Defensive buildings are unique in that they act like immobile units, EXCEPT they can immiditely make an attack against an enemy during the enemy's turn. It is assumed the defensive building takes a shot at the enemy while they are coming into range.

Stage 2: Skirmish Battle
In the skirmish phase, players begin by spending credits to build units. First, return in harvesters out in the field to their refineries and move any in refineries out into the nearest tiberium field. Add the credits to your reserve once you have done so.

Each unit has a "time" stat that shows how fast it can be built from a production building. For example, the "Minigunner" has a time stat of 10%. This means it takes 10% of a turn to deploy a Minigunner. In this way, a player could have a Hand of NOD build 10 Minigunners in a turn, as 10 * 10% = 100%. The time rule acts per building, so multiple Hands of NOD allow you to deploy more infantry in a turn. These rules work similar for the Airstrip and Construction Yard as well.

With the Construction Yard, some buildings take more than one turn to reconstruct. For example, while a Hand of NOD has a time stat of 50%, the Tech Lab has a time stat of 300%; in other words, it takes three turns to rebuild a Tech Lab. To build the Lab, you'll need to pay for it in credits at the start of a turn, and three turns later, the building will finish construction and be placed on the battlefield again.

>>12582988
>>12583017
oh for fucks sake

>>12582913
I was thinking of keeping them in because they deter turtle strategies. A player can't hunker down and trollface in his base with a ton of defense, he has to maintain control of tiberium fields so he can get the money to do things.

Or at least the theory goes. In practice, this first edition of rules seems like it greatly favors turtling with base rebuilding and defensive buildings. Something to curb that, like cutting off the income of a player, would help quite a bit and prevent games for going on past six hours.

TWIII Straight ZOCOM list. Don't mind me just being GDI's leading experts on Tiberium Operations.

>>12583039
Loved how they actually resembled the units in the game, made me wanna run a guard vet army using SM scouts with cadian heads and catachan arms and add heavy bolters everwhere.

Really sucks playing an RA list with tib terrain vs a tib list.

>>12583116
what faction are you using anyway?
Unless you are using RA1 Allies you are kinda screwed

>>12583157
RA2, infantry heavy, thinking of adding flaktracks to get them around safely

Oh god, I still remember killing everyone with GI and Guardian GI swarm lists. Never big as Conscript Hoard lists but it still kills everything off. Take the British lists for Snipers and even Yuri armies have the hardest fucking time getting near me without being mauled.

>>12583051
After production of units is complete, the current player will be able to move his units. Right now, I don't have much depth on how this is done, but the idea is it follows rules similar to Warhammer, in that there is a movement phase and then a shooting phase. The units in C&C tabletop are all independent, however, and generally have much longer movement ranges than their Warhammer counterparts. Also, the total unit count is kept fairly low to prevent turns from lasting longer than five to ten minutes.

Global abilities are granted to players after a building has been in play for a certain amount of time. For instance, the Temple of NOD allows a player to launch a tactical nuclear missle after X turns, which kills infantry and light vehicles while doing heavy damage to tanks and buildings. The GDI Comm Center allows the GDI player to call in a napalm strike airstrike, which kills infantry in a line.

>>12583176
would spamming Desolators work?

Turn Example:
NOD Player and his counterpart, GDI Player are playing a quick game, in which each side is given a Power Plant, a Barracks/Hand of NOD, and a Refinery.

During the start of NOD Player's turn, his harvester returns and grants him 1000 more credits. NOD Player uses this money to build 7 Minigunners and 2 Rocket Soldiers. The Minigunners have a time stat of 10%, for 7 * 10% = 70%, and the Rocket Soldiers have a time stat of 15%, for a total of 2 * 15% = 30%. This uses up 100% of the Hand of NOD's turn building these troops.

Each Minigunner costs $100 and each Rocket Soldier costs $150, so in total, the troops built cost $1000 this turn, which is deducted from NOD Player's total credits.

The troops move out in an attempt to attack GDI Player's harvester, which is out in a Tiberium field close to NOD Player's base. The two Rocket Soldiers attack, dealing only light damage to the harvester this turn. The minigunners take up defensive positions just outside the Tiberium Field.

>>12583328
I think it should be based off Tiberian Sun though, since that has more diversity between GDI and Nod, and feels like a definite step forward from the original.

>>12584664
Right now, I'm trying to make the system generic enough where it could fit any of the C&Cs. I chose Tiberium Dawn though just because it was the first, although with a change to the army lists, you could easily move it up to Tiberium Sun or even Tiberium Twilight.

Tonight, I was interested in creating the base building mechanics and the resource gathering, since that's currently not offered in most tabletops currently and something that could be unique to C&C. I'm thinking I might actually continue work on it and refine the system some with a few playtests, make sure pacing is good and the core idea isn't flawed.

>>12583328
This sounds like it might almost work.

Needs brushing up and all that jazz, obviously, but as a concept it could function.

Also bumping to make it available to a new generation of /tg/.

Zocom GDI here. Hammerheads and zone raiders all up in this.

Also tend to purchase an ion cannon strike or two, just for flavor.

And before anyone suggests I don't have enough anti-armor....

MARV + 2 grenadiers + 2 rocket troopers. And I can fit a two predator escort in there too.

GDI win everything forever.

bumpin

Just my 2 cents
-drop the resource gathering, keep the bases
-make this work in both Red Alert and C&C, not just C&C

>>12587652

The resource gathering seems like it would be a bit clumsy in game but I like the idea, perhaps instead of having harvesters you set up some tiberium counters (that represent a field) and whoever controls those counters on the board gets the resources, no twoing and froing with harvesters?

Switching between Red Alert and C&C would seem simple enough, applying the same core rules to different units and maybe some variation in playstyle.

2 cents...
Miniatures need to be in 1/285th scale... that way you can have a larger scale than skirmish scale 28-32mm that GW wants to do things...

That way you can have the ranges feel appropriate to the computer incarnation... plus, if on a larger table, easier to model the buildings for actual bases...

You're now realising that the Firestorm defence is a reverse engineered Iron Curtain, and that GDI = good Soviets and that Nod = evil Allies.

>>12588599
>implying Nod isn't the one true hope of humanity

>>12588599
Kane was one of the advisors of Stalin though.

>>12589095
I realise that.

Over time, the Allies changed their tactics and started resembling the Soviets.

trying a trip on your slow ass board

I loved 1-4th edition...then that EA prick came onboard and ruined the game.

"Oh look lets spend all our money on getting big names to appear in pretty pictures in the rule book rather than on MAKING THE FUCKING GAMES GOOD!"

>>12589162
I believe it happened in the ant missions in RA1, if you want to pretend that's cannon (Which really wouldn't be too far out in the RA universe, all things considered.). Basically, the units you control in those missions are a mix of both Allied and Soviet units.

Speaking of which... ant army joke codex, lol.

>>12581283
1) Get 15 chrono-ivans.
2) manage to set them close to enemy main battleforce w/out alerting them
3) ????
4) There is profit. Profit everywhere.

>>12590289
Step 2 causes problems.

I did love dynamiting cows and shit like that.

Especially when you could make it tactically useful, rather than just sad and a bit creepy.

>>12590398
It causes problems, but is doable. Especially if you've got the main force distracted as they teleport in. Just gotta worry about their health.